Yep...although you'll prob be buying the Royale Server product separately maybe? (if ur suggesting it's not a selling point for cf)
Pure speculation Stace -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: CF or .DotNet what do you think? I would also bet that if I wanted to use Java to connect to Royale, I could. ----- Original Message ----- From: Stacy Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 5:32 pm Subject: RE: CF or .DotNet what do you think? > $10 says royale is built into cf 7...much like the remoting approach. > > Stace > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:12 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF or .DotNet what do you think? > > In what ways? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 4:48 pm > Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: CF or .DotNet what do you think? > > > Thanks for that we realize it, however our belief is that there > > will be ongoing better functionalities and closer coupling > between > > CF and Flash. > > > > Kind Regards - Mike Brunt > > > > Original Message ----------------------- > > FlashMX works with .NET. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mike Brunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2003 3:45 pm > > Subject: RE: Re: CF or .DotNet what do you think? > > > > > It is very true that most websites out there are HTML with > fancy > > > stuff like JavaScript/DHTML however as web applications > continue > > > their march into replacing legacy enterprise apps that will > not > > be > > > enough. > > > We see the integration of CFMX and FlashMX (and MX successors) > > to > > > be a pivotal issue in Application Server/Environment choice. > > .NET > > > does not offer such a logical path to building RIA's. If we > add > > > to that the RAD advantages of ColdFusion, we have no doubts > that > > > CF holds sway over .NET for all that we are involved in. > > > > > > Kind Regards Mike Brunt > > > Original Message ----------------------- > > > Currently there are things one can do with ASP.net that cannot > > > efficiently be > > > done in CF, however for most web development, it has already > > been > > > shown a number > > > of times that same or similar functionality can be done in CF > > with > > > far less > > > lines of code that in ASP. > > > > > > True, one does not have to be a C, C# or VB.NET programmer to > > > learn CF. > > > > > > All that said, the fact remains that the majority of web sites > > are > > > mostly plain > > > 'ol HTML, with some JavaScript thrown in. The actual dynamic > > > data driven sites > > > have a shorter development time in CF than in .ASP, however, > XML > > > handling is > > > still a moving target for CF, but they are getting there. > > > > > > For the evolving present, however, there seems to be room for > a > > > combination of > > > all the technologies, including even (gag) java! > > > > > > ====================================== > > > Stop spam on your domain, use our gateway! > > > For hosting solutions http://www.clickdoug.com > > > ISP rated: http://www.forta.com/cf/isp/isp.cfm?isp_id=772 > > > ====================================== > > > If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done! > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Eric Creese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:19 PM > > > Subject: CF or .DotNet what do you think? > > > > > > > > > | A while back I had posed a question about CF vs .DotNet. > Well > > > the discussion > > > here is picking up again and want to go to the mat for CF. I > > know, > > > like it, and > > > have built several apps and sites. I have 4 VB developers on > > > staff with limited > > > ASP and web development. They of course will probably lean > > towards > > > .DotNET. One > > > who has more ASP experience had to let me know that a real > > > developer would use > > > ASP and that CF is for non-developers. Another basically said > CF > > > can not provide > > > the robustness needed for a full blown App. > > > | > > > | Well I am asking for this boards feedback on the matter. > Your > > > pros and cons > > > would be much appreciated for my presentation. > > > | > > > | Eric > > > | > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
