Actually, looking at the processing times on that output looks a bit frightening to me.
I'm beginning to entertain the opinion that a methodology is more important and relevant and effective than the frameworks I've seen thus far for a number of considerations, among which is performance. Granted I haven't had a chance to test drive machii myself, and I will, but.... The numbers seem to speak for themselves :( - Calvin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 4:35 PM Subject: Re: machII(too much) > On Thursday, Aug 14, 2003, at 13:08 US/Pacific, Tony Weeg wrote: > > question: why does it seem like mach ii and this whole oop thingie > > with > > cf seem to over complicate a simple thing? > > Frameworks always look a bit complex at first, especially when you > compare them to a little sample application! The benefits of a > framework really only start to show as you application gets bigger and > more complex. > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=t:4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm?link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
