Can't give you a complete answer but a part of one.
It has something to do with interfaces. CFMX requires the IDispatch
interface and something I read in a forum from a tech support person is that
.NET components don't expose this by default. The .NET docs indicate that
.NET COM wrappers are in fact dual-interface by default, so I'm not sure
what's up.
The solution was to add an attribute to the .NET component, but I don't
remember which. I just search the webforums and couldn't find the
thread--sorry.
Perhaps this will help you get on the right track...
Sam
-----------------------------------------------
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Charts: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
-----------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
>
> Hoping someone can help me out here, trying to create a com
> object with Studio .Net 2003. Now I have built the solution
> and .Net tells me I can use it in any application and that it
> is registered. However coldfusion can't create the object, is
> there a special trick to get a com object to work under CFMX.
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated..
>
> Regards
> Andrew Scott
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
- WDDX vs raw XML? Shawn Grover
- RE: WDDX vs raw XML? Tom Kitta
- CF MX 6.1 and com objects Andrew Scott
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Andrew Scott
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Samuel R. Neff
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Andrew Scott
- Re: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Matt Liotta
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Andrew Scott
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Samuel R. Neff
- RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects Andrew Scott
- RE: WDDX vs raw XML? Shawn Grover
- Re: WDDX vs raw XML? Matt Liotta