> ColdFusion or
> CF Functionality, or simply describe CF to non-ColdFusion developers.
> That's not to say that some of them aren't useful, but if you honestly
> believe tey are even comparable to the quality of CFDJ articles, you
> obviously haven't ever read the magazine.
>
I never made a quality judgment in regard to either CFDJ or Builder. I
am simply suggested that other publications such as Builder have better
reputations, higher readership, and actually pay for content. If I was
a CFML author I would certainly spend my time working with those types
of publications. Actually, that statement is a little silly. I am a
CFML author and have written for Builder, DevX, Macromedia, Evolt, etc.
I hope that you find the quality of my CFML articles up to the quality
standards that you feel CFDJ has. Further, I hope that other authors
will consider writing for these online publications since that will
only increase their quality and more importantly get CFML in front of a
whole new set of eyes. CFDJ certainly won't be exposing the non-CF
crowd to CFML. Although, MXDJ has a chance in that regard.
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
