85.46% MSIE 6.0
4.28% MSIE 5.0
4.16% MSIE 5.5
1.67% Mozilla/5.0
That's 93.9% MSIE 5.0 or better.
On a couple smaller sites I've got 98% and 93.3% MSIE 5.0 or better.
Least for me, that 90% is too LOW. I haven't looked at your site in depth,
but it seemed there was a lot of stuff that would be interesting to the
geeks of the world, who undoubtedly have a much higher incidence of non-MS
browsers, because they care enough to compare and select the best, unlike
the general public with has the intelligence of lemmings.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: Browser wars (was Re: Can someone recommend a
> good web development browser?)
>
> On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:53, Richard Crawford wrote:
> > > While I prefer the Mozilla browsers and Opera
> technically, I find I always
> > > end up coming back to IE just because I have to make sure
> the site works for
> > > my 90%+ userbase. If I were to just spot test in IE I
> would miss something
> > > that I don't explicitly test for.
>
> The stats for my main public site are:
>
> 68.05% Micro$oft Internet Exploder
> 25.53% Netscape
> REST : google/opera and other things
>
> Thats a far cry from 90%. You're probably talking about your
> site - but
> I was wondering what others are getting in their logs? Whats
> the general
> take on the browser (cold) war?
>
> The news lies - The logs don't ... often
>
> --
> Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
