Well unless someone converts the functions over to the other languages you
are stuck with an entry to C++.


You don't need Black Night for .Net, I finally worked out how to write a com
object and incorporate this into cf without the need of making changes to
the compiled code. Making Black Night redundant, or not worth the money you
payed for it anyway.


I have written a com object in C#,C++,Visual Basic, J# and java and all work
without the use of Black Night.


You can still code a CFX in any language you choose, just that the entry
point will be C++ as stated.


And again Matt, you said you can't I say you can.


Who ever wrote Black Night must not have been writing their com objects
properly, every com object I have created works without the use of Black
Night:-)


Now what was your point again?

Regards
Andrew Scott
Technical Consultant

NuSphere Pty Ltd
Level 2/33 Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205

Phone: 03 9686 0485  -  Fax: 03 9699 7976   

  _____  

From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 11 June 2004 9:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: comparing CF and BD (was Re: COLDFUSION has JUST been
DISContinued!!!!)

> Actually you can create CFX's in C# and Visual Basic.
>
>  The only problem is that the very fist entry is written in C++ then
> you can
>  hybrid a class written in Visual Basic or C# or even J#..
>
That isn't really writing a CFX in C#, VB, or J# since you are writing
the CFX in C++ and simply making use of another language at an object
level. BD.NET allows you to write the actual CFX in a .NET language.
However, if you are looking to write CFX tags in a .NET language with
CFMX, you can make use of Black Knight. Interestingly enough, Java CFXs
can often be recompiled with J# and Black Knight with little to no
changes.

-Matt
  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to