Ray
At 10:49 AM 7/2/2004, you wrote:
>Sorry to hijack the thread, but what does Fusebox 4 bring to the table that
>Mach-II doesn't. I'm curious because I'm about to spend this weekend trying
>to design a Mach-II site and was curious if I should also devote some time
>to Fusebox 4.
>
>Marlon
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 9:46 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Fusebox 4 MVC
> >
> > > The controller circuit is there, it's just not explicitly
> > > called "controller", it's called "blog" I believe. MVC isn't
> > > about naming the circuits something, it's about what the
> > > circuits do. And you also must consider what you want the
> > > user to see in the URL. I thought
> > > www.mysite.com/index?fuseaction=blog.main was more
> > > descriptive than something like
> > > www.mysite.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=controller.main.
> > > Sorry if this confused you, but you can consider the blog
> > > circuit(s) as the "controller". Hope that helps.
> >
> > Just to add on what Brian said..
> > You can also alias the circuit to whatever "viewable" name you'd like. If
>it
> > helps to keep the directory called CONTROLLER and refer to it as blog,
> > you
> > can do that as well.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
