> I agree completely - the argument is always that you can't
> change something
> so fundamental because you don't know how people've used
> it.

> I applaud, mostly, MM's desire to remain as backwards
> compatible as
> possible.  Sometimes it's just awkward tho'.  ;^)

Yea... I often wish they were passed by reference also... But more
than that I wish we had freaking nulls... :) And that cffunction
defaulted to output="false" and "this" were the private scope in
CFC's... although it's too late to hope for either of the latter...

s. isaac dealey     954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to