Mark A Kruger wrote:
>
> The firestorm has started and you are going to be challenged on most of
> these I would wager. Still, your list shows you are no novice.
The list is not Micha's, it is maintained by ACM and many people
contributed in a public process:
http://gathering.tweakers.net/forum/list_messages/733783/
> I liked it
> well enough to post it on my blog. When the point by point rebuttals come in
> I'll post them too - for the sake of fair play <g>.
Just make sure they contain credible claims (CLI logs) :)
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Micha Schopman
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Andrew Dixon
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Jochem van Dieten
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Damien McKenna
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Mark A Kruger
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Scott Stroz
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Andrew Dixon
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS:... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Marlon Moyer
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Mark A Kruger
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Micha Schopman
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Scott Stroz
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Peter Farrell
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Jochem van Dieten
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... James Smith
- RE: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gurus o... Dave Watts
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Security gu... Peter Farrell
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Securit... Matt Robertson
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Massimo, Tiziana e Federica
- Re: Access alternatives (WAS: Sec... Jochem van Dieten