I did read the docs. The docs state:

encoded

Optional

Yes

Applies to FormField and CGI types; ignored for all other types. Specifies
whether to URLEncode the form field or header.

I am using it on a cookie type.  

Russ

  _____  

From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Alternatives

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:16:17 -0400, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since CFHTTP support is broken in all versions since CF 4.5 (as in
> CFHTTPPARAM automatically urlencodes all the names and values, and there's
> nothing we can do about it), I was wondering if there are any CFMX
> alternatives to CFHTTP, short of writing your own java classes every time
> you need to post something.  Isn't there a way to extend the CFHTTPPARAM
tag
> or something and modify certain methods not to URLEncode the data?
>

Dude, you just have to read the docs:

http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-p59.htm#wp110004
9

We use it extensively just fine. Look at the "encoded" attribute.

Regards,
Dave.

  _____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to