I did read the docs. The docs state:
encoded
Optional
Yes
Applies to FormField and CGI types; ignored for all other types. Specifies
whether to URLEncode the form field or header.
I am using it on a cookie type.
Russ
_____
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFHTTP Alternatives
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:16:17 -0400, Russ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since CFHTTP support is broken in all versions since CF 4.5 (as in
> CFHTTPPARAM automatically urlencodes all the names and values, and there's
> nothing we can do about it), I was wondering if there are any CFMX
> alternatives to CFHTTP, short of writing your own java classes every time
> you need to post something. Isn't there a way to extend the CFHTTPPARAM
tag
> or something and modify certain methods not to URLEncode the data?
>
Dude, you just have to read the docs:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/tags-p59.htm#wp110004
9
We use it extensively just fine. Look at the "encoded" attribute.
Regards,
Dave.
_____
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- CFHTTP Alternatives Russ
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Dave Carabetta
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Russ
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Dave Carabetta
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Jochem van Dieten
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Dave Carabetta
- Re: CFHTTP Alternatives Andrew Grosset