blik. don't do that. that's one of the beauties of CF by comparison to
more stringent languages.
I do agree with everything else you've said.
At 03:01 PM 8/29/2000 -0400, Zachary Bedell wrote:
>Basically, I'm looking for something that would allow you to force
>declaration of variables, types, maximum lengths, etc. Then you can
>specify (perhaps in specifically formatted comments) the requirements
>for a variable & have the "compiler" make sure they're in range.
>This would completely eliminate any parameter not defined or syntax
>type errors on your server (a good thing for the server) and would
>make it possible to create a proper CFDoc system a la JavaDoc. (I
>know that's a quick description, but if anyone is interested I could
>elaborate...)
!j!
The mark of mediocrity is searching for the precedent.
!jeff! sherwood Director of BIGWORDS.com Web Site Design / JEDI
BIGWORDS.com worker#2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.r.e.c.o.v.e.r.e.d.n.e.t.s.c.a.p.e.u.s.e.r. . . . 415.543.1400.x300
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
