> > > The question is not being in favor or not. The question is that the approach > claims > it will make the application easier to follow, and I find the application > much harder to follow. > Ok, "it is because the FB application was not properly structured", but isn't > FB supposed > to precisely make the application easier to structure ? > Ok, "the FB progammer was dumb"? But isn't FB supposed to make the task > easier for programers? > I don't know what failed, only what I can say from the result is that, in > that particular case, > it is a failure. >
I don't know that Fusebox necessarily makes any claims about making the application easier for the uninitiated to follow. From the fusebox.org site: "the system addresses development problems such as unmanageable complexity, wasteful redundancy of effort, time-consuming code maintenance, and slow development speed. " I'm not a fusebox zealot, but I think it does achieve those goals when used properly. Like any tool, in the hands of someone who doesn't know what they're doing it can just add an extra layer of indirection making it harder to follow the code. The same is true of any structured approach, not just Fusebox. Spike -- -------------------------------------------- Stephen Milligan Code poet for hire http://www.spike.org.uk Do you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:195291 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
