> -----Original Message----- > From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:11 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Ajax and CFCs > > Two reasons: > > 1) Because MM does not want to continue to invest in developing WDDX > unless there is a substantial deman from its client base. I know this > for fact beause I inquired about it. > > 2) I asked everyone here a couple of months ago if the OpenWDDX effort > should be restarted and the consensus was the WDDX was fine in its > current state.
Personally I disagree when it comes to cross-server support. Its support in CF may be fine, but the rest of the libraries are nasty. The JS library, in particular is truly aged at this point. ;^) But WDDX is definitely the kind of solution I've been ranting about: something less complex than SOAP, but more complex than JSON which allows structured data to be passed to AND from JavaScript in a standardized way. Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:215228 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
