I would disagree with that...depending on your design model, it is a good way to include headers instead of having to write an include statement on every page.
Eric -----Original Message----- From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 30 December 2005 11:52 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: HTML In Application.cfm >I would never use Application.cfm for output. As far as I'm concerned >its strictly for internal-use code. So I wouldn't use raw html OR an >include. I would use the include on my display template. I regard >Application.cfm as part of the processing tier of an app, not the >display tier. > > I would say that while doing this is certainly possible its the wrong > tool for the job. I'll 2nd Matt's reply. CF does allow developers to do some things that "work", but really shouldn't be done. ;-) Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:228040 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
