MVC Design says it's best practice... and I'm pretty sure this has been well accepted as the better approach
On 12/30/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>BOTH will include the header and only in one place....so why not use > the best > practice and include it via the template and not Application.cfm?? > > Who said "it is the best practice"? > If you consider Application.cfm as tool which can (among many other > things) generate a header, > why is it so evil to let it generate the header ? > Of course, if you need different headers depending on parts of the > application, then CFINCLUDE them... > .... OR store the different parts of your application in differnet > directories, and... > .... use a specific Application.cfm to generate the particular headers ;-) > > This is MY best practice. > > -- > _______________________________________ > REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; > See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm > (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Thanks. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:228043 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
