That's what I'm saying about adding the "url." in front of it. Why depend on "should not..." Why not be sure? Why not tell the app exactly where stat will be and where to look for it? I just don't understand why you'd elect to let CF go searching through the scopes looking for it, when you could head it off at the pass.
--Ferg Claude Schneegans wrote: > >>The above line would fail if the only foo was URL.foo passed in via > the URL. > > Of course it would, but it would 100% of the time, and > > <cfif foo eq 5> should not fail ever. This is my issue. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:235561 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
