On 5/8/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have to agree - I still think CF5 was more stable that MX. Java > certainly did add a few more oddities in terms of stability which needs > far > more tweaking of the JVM.
Oddly, 6.1 did much better for us, and 7 has been even better then 6.1. Didn't have to mess with the JVM much over here. A couple of things, like session timeouts for jrun or mailspool/thread settings came up eventually, but the solutions were all over the place, and editing the config wasn't too... ** Stability-wise. 4.5 was pretty solid, from what I remember. That's what I started on. *sniff* with my bud that's now gone. Alas. Eh, look at majordomo. That sucker lasted ferever. Solid. Solid as a rock. We built this city... Um... never mind. Got a little carried away. =-] Generally: Guess a lot depends on what you're trying to do, etc.., as to what problems you run into, etc.. Hmmm... well, that's all for me. ** Cheers Lev, wherever you may be. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239803 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
