I think it is also dependant on what your doing on the server.
Single site, prob no issues.
Multiple sites (i.e. shared hosting), that's when u have more problems.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Denny Valliant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 08 May 2006 12:34
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: ASP.Net book for CF programmer

On 5/8/06, Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have to agree - I still think CF5 was more stable that MX.   Java
> certainly did add a few more oddities in terms of stability which 
> needs far more tweaking of the JVM.


Oddly, 6.1 did much better for us, and 7 has been even better then 6.1.

Didn't have to mess with the JVM much over here.  A couple of things, like
session timeouts for jrun or mailspool/thread settings came up eventually,
but the solutions were all over the place, and editing the config wasn't
too...
**
Stability-wise.  4.5 was pretty solid, from what I remember.  That's what I
started on. *sniff* with my bud that's now gone. Alas.

Eh, look at majordomo. That sucker lasted ferever. Solid. Solid as a rock.
We built this city... Um... never mind. Got a little carried away. =-]

Generally: Guess a lot depends on what you're trying to do, etc.., as to
what problems you run into, etc..

Hmmm... well, that's all for me.
**
Cheers Lev, wherever you may be.




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239804
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to