>> Escrow licence on the source. If I wanted to support someone else's work, than I might as well just make my own.
>> I know that I'd feel uncomfortable having my stuff sitting in a >> proprietary solution... >> So you don't use MS SQL Server, Oracle and DB/2 either? It's pretty obvious that MSSQL, Oracle and DB2 aren't open-source. At the same time though, they also work under the same core principals and work generally under the same features. I don't care about the low-level details of how they work, I just want to be sure that it's going to be around for more than a few years... !k -----Original Message----- From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 1:03 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Stored procs (was Top 100 ColdFusion Programmers) Kevin Aebig wrote: > Not to mention that there's strength in numbers. Why would someone want to > switch when they can find numerous online resources to issues / problems > they're having with more widely adopted DBs? > > How can they be sure that you'll continue to support / upgrade this > solution? Escrow licence on the source. > I know that I'd feel uncomfortable having my stuff sitting in a > proprietary solution... So you don't use MS SQL Server, Oracle and DB/2 either? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:251314 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
