I think that "Terrence Ryan" had the best approach to the situation. CFMX is a stable product, we've run about 15 CFMX servers around the world supporting corporate intranets and extranets with a constant load and rarely have problems.
Take a look at Terrence's pragmatic approach and try to emulate that. I think you'll find your answer. BN >Bit of an odd one this - but does anyone else find CF a little more >"unreliable" than other similar products when using them in day to day use. > >The only reason I ask is that our CF servers always seem a little more >unstable than some of our other servers running things such as ASP.NET or >Ruby on Rails. CF just seems to restart itself more than I believe it >should. > >I am the only one? I'm pretty sure our code is fairly sound, and that our >servers aren't under too much load. > >-- >Neil Middleton > >Visit feed-squirrel.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253264 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
