I agree. I mean, I've been doing government, military and intelligence related CF applications for 6 or 7 years now, and we haven't really found any major problems. We generally run large systems of multiple CF servers with some kind of hardware load balancing and it works great.
As many people have said, the most notable exceptions to this have been from bad code. > -----Original Message----- > From: Brent Nicholas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 11:32 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Reliability > > I think that "Terrence Ryan" had the best approach to the situation. CFMX > is a stable product, we've run about 15 CFMX servers around the world > supporting corporate intranets and extranets with a constant load and > rarely have problems. > > Take a look at Terrence's pragmatic approach and try to emulate that. I > think you'll find your answer. > > BN > > >Bit of an odd one this - but does anyone else find CF a little more > >"unreliable" than other similar products when using them in day to day > use. > > > >The only reason I ask is that our CF servers always seem a little more > >unstable than some of our other servers running things such as ASP.NET or > >Ruby on Rails. CF just seems to restart itself more than I believe it > >should. > > > >I am the only one? I'm pretty sure our code is fairly sound, and that > our > >servers aren't under too much load. > > > >-- > >Neil Middleton > > > >Visit feed-squirrel.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:253265 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
