Just a tiny hint is this... http://www.markdrew.co.uk/blog/index.cfm/2006/11/27/Comparing-Component-speed-on-different-CFML-engines
Greetings / Grüsse Gert Franz Customer Care Railo Technologies GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.railo.ch Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei: deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/ english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/ Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) schrieb: > Interesting, surely you should get Adobe to change ColdFusion to be as fast > as Railo (though I haven't seen or used Railo so I would have take your work > that it is faster!) > > > > > "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, > Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, > Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is > confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the > intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note > that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the > information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have > received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call > our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within this > communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." > Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gert Franz > To: CF-Talk > Sent: Wed Feb 07 07:42:18 2007 > Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting? > > Hi Neil, > > i can easily post why this is: > > Railo, for a good reason which I will post down below does not support > the following. > > 1: <cfset a = structNew()> > 2: <cfset a["sub.subkey"] = "John"> > 3: <cfset b = a.sub.subkey> <--- this throwhs an error > > since a does not contain a key named "sub". It just contains a key named > "sub.subkey". And all the texts in CFFM are defined like this. So I had > to write a function for converting the keys into real structs. > In fact in the above code in line 2 the statement does not insert a key > named "sub" in the struct "a" and in the key "sub" a subkey named > "subkey". The struct really contains a struct with one single key named > "sub.subkey". You can easily check this by dumping it out in CFMX. > > In order for our blog to work I adapted CFFM for Raymond Camden's blog > as well, which did not work out of the box as well since it contained > some syntax errors which Railo mentions and MX ignores. > > Now for the reason why Railo does not support this: performance. > The checking for subkeys in a struct has to be done at every single > access to a struct variable. This slows down performance. Maybe this is > one of the reasons why structs are many times faster in Railo than in CFMX. > > Greetings / Grüsse > Gert Franz > Customer Care > Railo Technologies GmbH > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > www.railo.ch > > Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei: > deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/ > english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/ > > > > Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) schrieb: > >> "for CFFM because CFFM "out of the box" doesn't work with Railo." >> >> Who's fault is that? Does CFFM work on ColdFusion and BD with no changes? >> Surely if it is CFML then it should be Adobe based CFML as the benchmark, >> guide. >> >> N >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant, >> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business, >> Registered in England, Number 678540. It contains information which is >> confidential and may also be privileged. It is for the exclusive use of >> > the > >> intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) please >> > note > >> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the >> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have >> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or >> > call > >> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910. The opinions expressed within >> > this > >> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." >> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Rick Root >> To: CF-Talk >> Sent: Wed Feb 07 04:03:21 2007 >> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting? >> >> On 2/6/07, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I agree, unless your giving it away, I wouldn't pay for hosting on >>> anything >>> other than the official product, I only stand to loose stuff and gain >>> nothing. >>> >>> >> I recommend Bluedragon hosting for some of my clients who get VPS accounts >> at VivioTech, but only because BlueDragon 6.2 is almost completely >> compatible with CFMX 6.1 - and most of the stuff I write for the open >> > source > >> world, I try to make compatible with Bluedragon - and it's not that >> difficult. >> >> As for Railo... I've never worked with it, but I know that Gert has sent >> > me > >> changes for CFFM because CFFM "out of the box" doesn't work with Railo. >> >> Rick >> >> >> > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268945 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
