Well, this is by no means an indicator of how well or bad CF/Railo performs
on the whole with components/structures, there are far too many factors not
accounted for and in the authors own words, should be taken with a pinch of
salt and are not scientific.

For one, it was on a Mac and I doubt anyone runs a production site on their
MacBook!






 


"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of the
intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please note
that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
received this communication in error please return it to the sender or call
our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Gert Franz
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Feb 07 08:06:43 2007
Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?

Just a tiny hint is this...

http://www.markdrew.co.uk/blog/index.cfm/2006/11/27/Comparing-Component-spee
d-on-different-CFML-engines

Greetings / Grüsse
Gert Franz
Customer Care
Railo Technologies GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.railo.ch

Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei:
deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/
english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/



Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) schrieb:
> Interesting, surely you should get Adobe to change ColdFusion to be as
fast
> as Railo (though I haven't seen or used Railo so I would have take your
work
> that it is faster!)
>
>
>
>
> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
> Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
> confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of
the
> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please
note
> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or the
> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have
> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or
call
> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within
this
> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Franz
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wed Feb 07 07:42:18 2007
> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> i can easily post why this is:
>
> Railo, for a good reason which I will post down below does not support 
> the following.
>
> 1: <cfset a = structNew()>
> 2: <cfset a["sub.subkey"] = "John">
> 3: <cfset b = a.sub.subkey> <--- this throwhs an error
>
> since a does not contain a key named "sub". It just contains a key named 
> "sub.subkey". And all the texts in CFFM are defined like this. So I had 
> to write a function for converting the keys into real structs.
> In fact in the above code in line 2 the statement does not insert a key 
> named "sub" in the struct "a" and in the key "sub" a subkey named 
> "subkey". The struct really contains a struct with one single key named 
> "sub.subkey". You can easily check this by dumping it out in CFMX.
>
> In order for our blog to work I adapted CFFM for Raymond Camden's blog 
> as well, which did not work out of the box as well since it contained 
> some syntax errors which Railo mentions and MX ignores.
>
> Now for the reason why Railo does not support this: performance.
> The checking for subkeys in a struct has to be done at every single 
> access to a struct variable. This slows down performance. Maybe this is 
> one of the reasons why structs are many times faster in Railo than in
CFMX.
>
> Greetings / Grüsse
> Gert Franz
> Customer Care
> Railo Technologies GmbH
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.railo.ch
>
> Join our Mailing List / Treten Sie unserer Mailingliste bei:
> deutsch: http://de.groups.yahoo.com/group/railo/
> english: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/railo_talk/
>
>
>
> Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) schrieb:
>   
>> "for CFFM because CFFM "out of the box" doesn't work with Railo."
>>
>> Who's fault is that? Does CFFM work on ColdFusion and BD with no changes?
>> Surely if it is CFML then it should be Adobe based CFML as the benchmark,
>> guide.
>>
>> N
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
>> Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
>> Registered in England, Number 678540.  It contains information which is
>> confidential and may also be privileged.  It is for the exclusive use of
>>     
> the
>   
>> intended recipient(s).  If you are not the intended recipient(s) please
>>     
> note
>   
>> that any form of distribution, copying or use of this communication or
the
>> information in it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you
have
>> received this communication in error please return it to the sender or
>>     
> call
>   
>> our switchboard on +44 (0) 20 89107910.  The opinions expressed within
>>     
> this
>   
>> communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions." 
>> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rick Root
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Sent: Wed Feb 07 04:03:21 2007
>> Subject: Re: Anyone interested in Railo hosting?
>>
>> On 2/6/07, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> I agree, unless your giving it away, I wouldn't pay for hosting on
>>> anything
>>> other than the official product, I only stand to loose stuff and gain
>>> nothing.
>>>     
>>>       
>> I recommend Bluedragon hosting for some of my clients who get VPS
accounts
>> at VivioTech, but only because BlueDragon 6.2 is almost completely
>> compatible with CFMX 6.1 - and most of the stuff I write for the open
>>     
> source
>   
>> world, I try to make compatible with Bluedragon - and it's not that
>> difficult.
>>
>> As for Railo... I've never worked with it, but I know that Gert has sent
>>     
> me
>   
>> changes for CFFM because CFFM "out of the box" doesn't work with Railo.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
>
>
> 



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:268946
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to