Sure. The switch would do so via sticky sessions, so we're back to where we started - sticky sessions are necessary for a lot of functionality.
On Dec 21, 2007 10:56 AM, Adam Haskell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not a sys admin so I might be off here but couldn't you get around this > with a switch that ensures requests coming off a certain server gets routed > properly? > > Adam Haskell > > > On Dec 19, 2007 6:18 PM, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sean Corfield wrote: > > > The issue here is that if you do not have sticky session, you have to > > > be able to manage sessions that move between servers at will. That > > > means that either: > > > 1) you use client scope instead of session scope (with all the > > > attendant restrictions) > > > 2) you write your own session management based on cookies > > > 3) you rely on session replication (and, if you're not on CF8, make > > > sure you don't put CFCs in session scope - and if you are on CF8, make > > > sure you don't put arrays in the CFCs that are in session scope - and > > > whatever other restrictions there are) > > > > No queries either. > > > > 4. You do not use cfimage, cfpresentation, and other tags that rely on 2 > > subsequent requests to be directed to the same instance. > > > > Jochem > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:295231 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
