No change needed. The CF tags we all know & love will work.
ALLAIRE needs to know Java, we don't. Just as we don't need
to know C++
Check out:
Archived video and presentation files from the two conference
general sessions are now available in streaming media format at
http://www.allaire.com/conference.
Don't miss:
Due to an overwhelming number of requests, the
MegaDeveloper 2000 video is also available for you to view at
http://www.allaire.com/conference/adc2k_megadev.ram.
best, paul
At 01:21 PM 12/1/00 -0700, you wrote:
>ok, for us dough heads (I'm probably the only one) - where would you, or
>anyone else, recommend cf developers to start preparing for the new version
>if they have only ever programmed in CF?
>
>je
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 11:18 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Java and CF
>
>
>The performance comparison Allaire demonstrated at the Conference is not
>exhaustive, of course, but, for THAT app, Allaire's new Java-based approach
>out-performed its existing C++-based approach.
>
>best, paul
>
>At 10:39 AM 12/1/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >There is no WAY a Java server can
> >out perform a *well* *written* C++ server.
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
