In other words, Everything is relative.
Along the same line of reasoning, just because a big company does it. It
does not mean it is a good thing. In my experience the exact opposite is
true. The bigger the company, the more ineffiecient in my experience.
Someone already said this, but I will repeat it. The big difference between
CF and ASP is development time and costs.
Almost any web application could be developed faster in CF than ASP, and CF
has a huge library of built in funtions and free tags that are available.
jon
----- Original Message -----
From: "Benjamin Fitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 11:01 AM
Subject: RE: Big companies using CF
> I've been following this thread on big companies using CF for awhile. Sure
a
> lot of big companies use CF. But please think of the type of application
> they use CF for.
>
> Internal sites and extranets don't get a lot of traffic.
>
> Other questions you might want to ask instead of "Which Big Companies use
> CF" are:
>
> What do they use CF for?
>
> How much traffic does their site receive? daily, weekly, monthly.
>
> How much of that traffic is hitting dynamic CF generated pages?
>
> This is a much better benchmark for you to judge Cold Fusion on.
>
> A typical example is BMWUSA web site that was mentioned here earlier. I
can
> guarantee you this site isn't getting hit nearly as much as VW's new film
> web site. Just because BMW is a big name doesn't mean it gets a lot of
hits
> to it's web site. What is a lot of hits? 500,000 unique users a month? 5
> million unique users a month? 5 million unique users a day?
>
> Benjamin Fitts
> Web Developer
> uclick
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
