Database tuning is an important line item on my discussion list for this meeting.
To expand on some of your points. First the system currently limits users to only selecting data from on year at a time as a stop-gap measure to try and limit the operating cost of the query. The trouble is that this is both too limiting and not limiting enough. First it is still quite possible for a user to build a query that will jam up the system while at the same time it limits users who want specific enough information to be reasonable, but want it for multiple years. It forces them to submit the same request over and over only changing the year. Speaking of these users, they are truly a mixed bunch. They range from the professional who supposedly knows what they want to the soccer parent who wants to know *everything* that has been used withing a 100 mile radius of their home/work/school. Unfortunately we have to cater to both as best as we can. A big driver for making this as self-help as possible was the realization that we where commonly getting these requests from both sides of a litigation case in civil court. But because of how each side might have asked for the information combined with how different developers might have understood the request and the data we could be providing radically different results to each side that is effect provided some sort of de-facto 'interpretation' of the data. A position we really do not want to be in. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:321878 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.4