Even better! :o)
-----Original Message----- From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT) [mailto:sd1...@att.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 5:00 PM To: cf-talk Subject: RE: Is it time for Adobe to Rebrand Cold Fusion? Wait... Wouldn't that be Ray 2010.1, Ray 2010.2, Ray 2010.3? :) Steve -----Original Message----- From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:r...@whitestonemedia.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:58 PM To: cf-talk Subject: RE: Is it time for Adobe to Rebrand Cold Fusion? [spamtrap bayes][spamtrap heur] Just tag 'em... Ray 1.1, Ray 1.2, Ray 1.3 :o) -----Original Message----- From: Ian Skinner [mailto:h...@ilsweb.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:05 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: Is it time for Adobe to Rebrand Cold Fusion? [spamtrap bayes][spamtrap heur] On 6/22/2010 11:48 AM, Eric Roberts wrote: > Now there's an idea...at least it would help remembering the year they were > born hehehehe > But could get confusing with twins, triplets, etc as well as people who get really busy and mange to have a birth in the first quarter AND the forth quarter of the year! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael-Dinowitz/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:334762 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm