Performance overhead, especially in an application that could be linked to thousands of data sources?
-----Original Message----- From: Brian Kotek [mailto:brian...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 September 2011 18:49 To: cf-talk Subject: Re: ORM overhead You're not going to get anything other than anecdotal opinions, but everyone I know switched to ORM as soon as it was available. As far as "overhead", I'm not sure what you mean. Coding overhead? Performance overhead? On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Richard White <rich...@j7is.co.uk> wrote: > > to rephrase this question slightly, has there been much take up on the CF9 > ORM? i read somewhere it was one of the most welcome enhancements in CF9, > but then i also read somewhere else its an overhead too far for many > developers > > > > > Hi, we are looking to restructure our system using ORM but are > > wondering: > > > > firstly, about the general overhead of the CF9 ORM? > > > > secondly, the overhead in terms of the following scenario: > > > > Our application is generalized and customizes itself and its database > > around users requirements. The users login to one central application > > but each client has their own database. So after logging in the system > > knows which database to use. > > > > Therefore, it appears we will have to configure ORM to setup an > > instance for each individual client. This could obviously spiral into > > the thousands. > > > > Would appreciate your feedback > > > > thanks > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now! http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology/dp/1430272155/?tag=houseoffusion Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:347722 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
