I have to WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree and embrace this answer.......beautifully
said and exactly what I was thinking...Thank you very much for saving me the
time to type it up!

"I first developed web apps in ASP but soon discovered CF.  But I was one of
those who came from a programming background -- 10+ years in VB, C, RPG, and
COBOL.  I gladly embraced CF for something that none of these other
languages offer: simplicity and speed of development.  Having coded CF
full-time now for over three years I have yet to encounter a situation where
I wished I was back in ASP-land.  Plus I have never encountered a language
where it is easier than CF to decipher and understand code written by
someone else -- even bad code.

Also, CFQUERY sure beats all that ADO code."  <----- YES, YES, YES!!! 3 big
cheers for this one!

Long live ALL programming languages so that we may have security in the job
market!

Erika


--------------------------------
AIM: WebErika5
Yahoo: WebErika
MSN: WebErika
AskMe.com Expert: WebErika
--------------------------------
Erika L. Walker
Vice President
RUWebby, LLC
201-370-4272 (c)
973-244-9120 (o)
153 Rutgers Lane
Parsippany, NJ 07054
--------------------------------
Website Design/Programming
Database Integration
Allaire Partner - ColdFusion
--------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: Howarth, Craig (IBK-NY) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 9:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: To ASP or not to ASP


I first developed web apps in ASP but soon discovered CF.  But I was one of
those who came from a programming background -- 10+ years in VB, C, RPG, and
COBOL.  I gladly embraced CF for something that none of these other
languages offer: simplicity and speed of development.  Having coded CF
full-time now for over three years I have yet to encounter a situation where
I wished I was back in ASP-land.  Plus I have never encountered a language
where it is easier than CF to decipher and understand code written by
someone else -- even bad code.

Also, CFQUERY sure beats all that ADO code.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhou, Mei Y (Mei) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 7:30 AM
> To:   CF-Talk
> Subject:      RE: To ASP or not to ASP
>
> Hi, I think I am in the opposite position as you, I have worked for ASP
for
> more than 3 years, and now I have to learn ColdFusion. Since I do not know
> CF as much as ASP,
> what I can say is that:
>
> 1. ASP is much powerful for people who comes from programming background,
> you can have much
> flexibility for customizing your web application, but CF will be more
> friendly for
> people who does not want to do much by themselves instead using tags...,
>
> e.g. you can use both VBScript/JavaScript for ASP, however, what we can
use
> for
>      CF? I have tried <CFSCript>, and from CF document, it says to look
for
>      JavaScript like to put it there, but I do not see too much
explanation
> there..
>
>
> 2. Besides, the most important thing here for us is:
>
> If Alliare disappear one day ( e.g. no more support for the marketing
reason
> ), where else you can find a job?
>
> However, if ASP disappear, e.g. C# is coming up... then, you can still use
> your VBScript
> and JavaScript to find yourself very marketable in the job market...
>
>
> Mei
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Parker, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: To ASP or not to ASP
>
>
> This is a Microsoft shop here so that makes me a lone CF'er singing the
> praises and virtues of CF. One of our Small Apps Team members in IS is
keen
> to explore CF a bit as he is currently entirely limited to ASP. He asked
me
> the other day, "What makes CF better than ASP?" I said that might be an
> interesting question to pose on CF-Talk (for legitimate comments, one way
or
> the other, without wishing to incite any flame wars :-)
>
>
> ****
>
> Kevin Parker
> Web Services Manager
> WorkCover Corporation
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> www.workcover.com
>
> p: +61 8 82332548
> f: +61 8 82332000
> m: 0418 800 287
>
>
>
>
>
>
****************************************************************************
> This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee only. It may contain
> information that is protected by legislated confidentiality and/or is
> legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you are
prohibited
> from disseminating, distributing or copying this e-mail. Any opinion
> expressed in this e-mail may not necessarily be that of the WorkCover
> Corporation of South Australia. Although precautions have been taken, the
> sender cannot warrant that this e-mail or any files transmitted with it
are
> free of viruses or any other defect.
> If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by return e-mail and destroy the original e-mail and any
copies.
>
****************************************************************************
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to