Hi all

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:

> A further suggestion is to avoid SESSION, APPLICATION and SERVER variables
> completely.  Build a site that will be ready for loadbalancing WITHOUT
> sticky sessions now and don't even fool with server specific shared memory
> scopes.

So what variables am I to use? Aren't URL variables a security breach?

Thanks!

* john *

>

>
>
> 2˘
>
> ~.netł
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Don Vawter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:10
> Subject: Any horror stories from not locking session vars?
>
> > I have been asked to do a code review of a site and I have found that the
> > developers don't bother to lock session variables when then read or write
> > them. Does anybody have an good horror stories about the dangers of doing
> > this so I legitimately show the customer why this is a problem.  He is a
> > nontechnical person so any talk of needing to single-thread processes when
> > using shared variables won't mean a thing to him. Since I always lock
> around
> > the variables I can't give him any personal horror stories. Perhaps some
> of
> > you have heard of some (I KNOW they won't come from YOUR sites because you
> > always follow best practices ;-) but maybe you inherited some.)
> >
> > TIA
> >
> > Don
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to