You have been listening too long to the trash liberal media and gun control
nuts spew forth.
You talk about having LOTs of faith in the average civilian...are you not
aware of permits to "carry" that thousands and maybe millions of American
have already? You don't go outside and fear for your life do you? No, you
trust that one of them won't use their gun on you. No different for armed
citizens on planes, in schools, etc. As long as they are trained and know
how to use a gun, yes all but criminals can be trusted.
As for gun battles on the plane before hijacking...look at the result when
it wasn't an option...no more WTC and thousands dead!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 1:48 PM
Subject: RE: Terrorism
> *snicker*
>
> HAHAHAHAAHHA!
>
> Carry a gun onboard an airplane to 'protect' it..HAHAHAH
> Oh that is soo ludicrous. You think the terrorists used guns to hijack the
> plane huh?
> Why? Because you've seen it on movies so many times before?
> hahahaha!
>
> What do you need to do to 'Hijack' a plane? Get to the Pilots and take
over
> the controls, or threaten the pilots with their lives. In this case I
> suspect that the terrorists themselves would have been flying the
aircraft.
> Secondly, take care of the flight crew, and instill enough fear in the
> passengers that all 100+ of them would not try to retake the aircraft. Are
> guns the only way to do that? Nuh uh.
>
> And what happens when a well meaning citizen/stewardess uses a
conventional
> firearm on an aircraft and accidentally shoots the captain, shoots out a
> window,or blows an engine?
>
> I'm afraid I can understand why all efforts are made to prevent firearams
> and other dagnerous devices and chemicals from being on board the aircraft
> in the FIRST place. You going to trust someone on the aircraft with an
> authorised gun who wasn't a federal agent or something like that? On EVERY
> plane? Wow..you must have LOTS of faith in the average civilian.
>
> No buddy, that would just mean BEFORE the plane is hijacked there will be
a
> gun/other battle that might bring the plane down anyway.How many
hijackings
> result in all hands lost?
>
> But you made me laugh..thanks 'Freedom'...
>
> At least you have the 'Freedom' to post misguided stuff under a pseudonym.
>
> -Angel Stewart
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Freedom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Truly think about this. If even a few people on those planes could have
> been carrying a gun, none of this would have happened today. Yes,
something
> would happen sometime, but not this today! The wrong thinking has
directed
> the politically correct policies of this country for too long. The
innocent
> are suffering because of misguided logic.
>
> Justice, in this instance today, should be swift and sure!
>
> Freedom
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
