Not to mention the fact you get to be lazier because somebody has already done the documentation for you and it's readily available. Instead of coming up with a bunch of documentation I tediously created and walking the new developer through it I can just say, go to this site and read up. Come back when your done. Lazy is good.
Rick -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:25 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox - opinions? I think the difference is that there is a good chance that an outside contractor might already know Fusebox. That won't be the case for something custom. Kevin >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/01 01:13PM >>> If someone led you to believe there was a real difference...they were mistaken. -----Original Message----- From: Zac Belado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 4:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox - opinions? > I know if I need more developers on a project I don't have to waste time > teaching them from the ground up, they can learn on their own. I really fail to see how this is any different than learning any developmental methodology. If someone has to read my methodology docs or someone has to read the fusebox docs they are still spending time reading and learning. What's the difference? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
