Bud, we're promising compatibility, and things look good now. We do know that they'll likely be some gotchas, and if this happens we'll provide a utility that will analyze your code and point out any trouble spots before you upgrade.
We're not kidding ourselves, we know that compatibility is an absolute must, and we know it is a big undertaking, which is why (as Matt mentioned) we have such a large team working on Neo. And so far so good. --- Ben -----Original Message----- From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 7:24 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: death of coldfusion On 12/30/01, Ben Forta penned: >Oh, and just to make it perfectly clear, in Neo you'll write CF as you do >now. You'll have other features and technologies available to you too, but >if you want to write CF as you do in CF5 (and earlier) you'll be able to. >The ease of use, the minimal learning curve, the rapid development - none of >that changes at all. Thanks Ben. Do you have a clue if CF 6 will handle programs written for 4.5 and 5? I had to change so much code when they added the scope variable to cflock from the move from 4.0 to 4.5 that it just wasn't funny. I don't want to go through THAT again. -- Bud Schneehagen - Tropical Web Creations _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ ColdFusion Solutions / eCommerce Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.twcreations.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ Dedicated Windows 2000 Server PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusiona FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
