:> It's going to run every request through CF, which is going :> to significantly increase the amount of work CF has to do. :> The same issue comes up with regular HTML pages - if you :> want to force authorization using CF, you might map .html to :> be processed by CF, but there's a serious performance penalty.
Hmmm... So is using CFCONTENT no more of a performance hit than if the pages were all .cfm pages anyway? I was just wondering if delivering pages using CFCONTENT was significantly slower than directly calling them as .cfm files. I guess it's time to do some gettickcount() testing :) Thanks, Kay. ______________________________________________________________________ Why Share? Dedicated Win 2000 Server · PIII 800 / 256 MB RAM / 40 GB HD / 20 GB MO/XFER Instant Activation · $99/Month · Free Setup http://www.pennyhost.com/redirect.cfm?adcode=coldfusionc FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
