Interesting. Any language that implements locking (read: any that are worth programming in) uses some sort of "sloppy" locking mechanism. Some are downright evil (read: C++). Certainly, I can't think of any multi- threaded languages that handle concurrency automatically.
----- Original Message ----- From: junkMail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Monday, March 18, 2002 12:50 pm Subject: Re: UDF question > Gosh, I disagree completely with this. > > For me, having my code littered with irrelevant CFLOCKs is sloppy. > > I'm comfortable with requiring the server setting. It's a simple, > clean,set-and-forget solution. Obviously, that's not going to > work for everyone. > If you can't enable Single Threaded Sessions on your server, then > you'll need > to do all the sloppy locking. (smile) > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 7:23 AM > Subject: RE: UDF question > > > > I don't recommend this. (Notice I said "I", not "Macromedia.") In > > general I feel this leads to sloppy programming, and if you > migrate and > > forget to use this setting, you can get in trouble. > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
