Have you been reading the thread? I don't use Fusebox because it does nothing for me. Additionally, it bothers me that the Fusebox people use common programming terms incorrectly.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:32 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > So do tell, in detail if you please, what you find objectionable about it. > Educated feedback is good for all be it pro or con. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:22 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > You get the wrong impression. I have seen plenty of Fusebox. I have > debated it on CFGURU as well as various other lists. I have debated it > at conferences and user groups as well. We even had Nat come out to > BACFUG to give a presentation on Fusebox 3. The effect? We all learned > yet again why we aren't using Fusebox. > > -Matt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:20 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > Uh huh. Normally the FB conversation stops shortly after someone pulls > out > > that old "nothing but organizing your code" claim. In my case, it > usually > > ends when I find myself getting semi-testy with Dave Watts about his > > knowledge (or lack thereof) of FB concepts. I'd prefer he save his > energy > > for the other 1500 constibutions he makes to the list each year. > > > > As for you interest in FB, it's a simple matter of jumping over to the > > Fusebox list and diving in. It's a friendly crowd and quite helpful. > Your > > contributions would be quite interesting, especially on the "CFMX: > Version > > 1 > > all over again" topic. > > > > Ken > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:58 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > > > This is all standard Fusebox crap. People make these statements about > > what Fusebox does using terms they clearly don't understand. Later, > when > > they are called on these terms they back away with, the "you must not > > understand" crap. If Fusebox is the best things since sliced bread, > tell > > us why. Prove it. > > > > -matt > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:44 PM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: Fusebox (was: I like CFMX) > > > > > > > Fusebox just tells you how to organize your code > > > > > > > > > Me thinks it's time you learn more about Fusebox if simple code > > > organization > > > is what you think it's all about. That's an old wives tale that > seems > > to > > > live on...and on...and on... > > > > > > That said, however, I really do understand and respect your > preference > > not > > > to use it. From previous list discussions it's clear you (and > others) > > have > > > your own preferred methods that work superbly within your > environment. > > > > > > Ken > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
