But why reinvent the wheel, why don't we take the most popular one, or one
that at least a majority of developers work with? I understand you not
wanting to code in a methodology, but have you actually coded in one, I used
to be so anti fusebox until I made a really complicated appliation and I
couldn't even figure out what I did. I recoded it in fusebox and have no
problem now finding out what order things go in, and what each section does.
Bob Everland
-----Original Message-----
From: Zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Content Management tool
At 07:22 PM 7/30/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>I seriously recommend useing a
>methodology, once you use one you never go back.
I don't think that we are going to agree on an existing methodology so its
might be a better idea to just come up with something for this project and
then work within that.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
