At 08:45 PM 7/30/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>But why reinvent the wheel, why don't we take the most popular one, or one
>that at least a majority of developers work with?
Does it? Is fusebox used by a majority of developers? I know one developer
who uses it. I won't argue with its popularity but simply because its
popular doesn't mean that its the best nor does it mean that it should be
used simply because its popular.
That's the sort of thinking that got us all using Windows.
>I understand you not
>wanting to code in a methodology, but have you actually coded in one, I used
>to be so anti fusebox until I made a really complicated appliation and I
>couldn't even figure out what I did.
Define a methodology? I use a framework for my own projects, use a similar
way of organizing projects and code in a similar way from project to
project. I would assume that this is, at its most basic, what fusebox is.
And why not build a new one? Or a small scale methodology suited to the
task at hand.
If nothing else it might serve as a useful intellectual exercise.
--
Disraeli was pretty close: actually,
there are Lies, Damnlies, Statistics,
Benchmarks, and Delivery dates."
from Fortune Magazine
email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://www.pixelgeek.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
