Not to get on a rant or anything but CF alone by itself is not an OOP
language, most of the programmers including myself have no expereience in
doing OOP (though a lot on the list may). Fusebox is about as close to an
organized way of programming CF as you can get, it's not new and it has
proven itself in a lot of instances. It's not better than Java and it's not
better than OOP, but this is CF. So we're sorry you don't wish to help us,
but a final decision had to be made to use a standard methodology and
Fusebox was the most popular on the list.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:12 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: CMS project comments
My team and I are currently building a CMS using CF and Java that has to
handle hundreds of thousands of content objects and scale to handle
millions of page requests an hour. I would be happy to contribute to an
open source CMS that can do the same thing. I may even be able to open
source code we have created here at DevX for our CMS. However, I am
unwilling to contribute to a project that shoots itself in the foot by
using something like Fusebox. It is important to use a scalable and
extensible application framework and architecture. Fusebox is neither.
While Fusebox is good for people who don't know how to create their own
architecture and/or framework, it should be avoided by those that do.
-Matt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
