Depends on your definition of the application. Just managing content
won't produce millions of requests. However, you have to serve the
managed content up in some way as well as deal with content syndication.
-Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick McElhaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 12:33 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: CMS project comments
I'm wondering: Does it really matter how scaleable (as in hits/hour)
it is? You're not going to have a million people hitting the
*application* at once are you?
>
> My team and I are currently building a CMS using CF and Java that has
to
> handle hundreds of thousands of content objects and scale to handle
> millions of page requests an hour. I would be happy to contribute to
an
> open source CMS that can do the same thing. I may even be able to open
> source code we have created here at DevX for our CMS. However, I am
> unwilling to contribute to a project that shoots itself in the foot by
> using something like Fusebox. It is important to use a scalable and
> extensible application framework and architecture. Fusebox is neither.
> While Fusebox is good for people who don't know how to create their
own
> architecture and/or framework, it should be avoided by those that do.
>
> -Matt
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
