You can do (almost) anything.NET, so in the same vein, if they do make java bytecode compilers for other languanges, I think they could wire those in just fine.
Support wise, the API documentation for different languages could be auto generated... I'm sure javadoc would make short work out of it. Plus, there's the community support process that macrobe already has in place... (although the unofficial lists seem to get more useful traffic?) > I've heard this suggestion before too... > > Cool so now we have cfm, cfscript, server-side actionscript (whatever > the hell that is), mxml, cfECMAscript... I know I'd just love to > support all that if I was Adobe. > > Intertestingly enough Sun are working on allowing php, python, ruby > etc... to also run on the JVM > (http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2006/02/02/LAMP-Java-Sun), > maybe we can also get all of this in CF? That way you could pick > languages like you pick underwear (hopefully one for each day of the > week). > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
