No need to apologise Barry. For the most part this has been a healthy debate about CF and its competitors. Anyone who relies on CF for their living should be aware of its competitors and how they compare to CF (especially how they compare to CF in the eyes of the bean counters and decision makers).
When I was interviewed for my current job, the Director of ICT told me that the executives had asked her why we weren't using .Net. She told me there was no reason for us to go to .Net but if we HAD to did I know of a way to get CF to work with .Net. (I told her about BD and she was very happy). There was and still is absolutely no reason for us to abandon CF for .Net but the execs had heard the hype about it and wanted to jump on the bandwagon. It's always been and will continue to be tough to "sell" CF against the mega $ might of MS. With Ruby and Rails, it's now looking like it might be another tough fight for CF :( --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
