Mark, besides Andrew, still others with experience with mix-ins may have more thoughts. I've not myself used them--but CFML is CFML. There's no reason I can imagine why FD would fail to work with any CFML at all.
Andrew, as for "The only thing that annoys me is that CFC's are shown as component's but you can't delve into their properties", can you explain what you mean? You absolutely can see the THIS scope of a CFC instance (and of course VAR scope of a method). What more about "delving in to their properties" are you finding a challenge with? Sorry if I'm revealing some ignorance my self with this question. Fortunately, the folks from Intergral are (or at least were) on this list, so they too may chime in with thoughts on this or other topics you or others may raise. /charlie http://www.carehart.org/blog/ -----Original Message----- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Scott Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 9:20 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: cfdebugger Mark, I think it does, when I did testing against MG:U I didn't really pay to much attention, but it seemed to from what I can recall. I know if you call super.method() it will go to that method / function so I guess it does:-) The only thing that annoys me is that CFC's are shown as component's but you can't delve into their properties. Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 8676 4223 Mobile: 0404 998 273 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
