suggest you refer back to Karen's previous entry and then follow up the
joelonsoftware link, about halfway donn the joelonsoftware post. it might
help



On 4/4/07, rod higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I can't see a bug at all. The dateformat function simply diplays the
> last two digits of the year of the date as it should. It the date is
> stored as 9.4.3866 you would expect a display of 9.4.66 wouldn't you?
>
> What I want to know is why #dateformat(1,"d.m.yyyy")# is 31/12/1899
> and not 1/1/900 ??
>
> On Apr 4, 11:07 am, "Chris Velevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On 4/4/07, Tom MacKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > My confusion initially was that #dateformat(718167,"d.m.yyyy")# gives
> > > 9.4.3866 which didn't look right at all so I thought is wasn't
> working. The
> >
> > Looks like a bug in the dateformat function. Perhaps you could raise
> > an issue with Adobe about it.
> >
> > Chris
> > --
> > Chris Velevitch
> > Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
> > m: 0415 469 095www.flashdev.org.au
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to