suggest you refer back to Karen's previous entry and then follow up the joelonsoftware link, about halfway donn the joelonsoftware post. it might help
On 4/4/07, rod higgins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I can't see a bug at all. The dateformat function simply diplays the > last two digits of the year of the date as it should. It the date is > stored as 9.4.3866 you would expect a display of 9.4.66 wouldn't you? > > What I want to know is why #dateformat(1,"d.m.yyyy")# is 31/12/1899 > and not 1/1/900 ?? > > On Apr 4, 11:07 am, "Chris Velevitch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On 4/4/07, Tom MacKean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > My confusion initially was that #dateformat(718167,"d.m.yyyy")# gives > > > 9.4.3866 which didn't look right at all so I thought is wasn't > working. The > > > > Looks like a bug in the dateformat function. Perhaps you could raise > > an issue with Adobe about it. > > > > Chris > > -- > > Chris Velevitch > > Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group > > m: 0415 469 095www.flashdev.org.au > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
