|
A client of mine said that
he was concerned with Mach-ii because he was worried about implicit invocation
security concerns. I've searched around but I haven't been able to get much
information about implicit invocation and security and nothing about Mach-ii
security concerns. How do I reply to his query in a way that will make him
confident in the framework? |
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns Joe Ferraro
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns Brian Kotek
- Re: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security concerns Sean Corfield
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security conce... Joe Ferraro
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security c... Jim Davis
- Re: [CFCDev] implicit invocation securi... Bill Rawlinson
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security c... Ben Rogers
- Re: [CFCDev] implicit invocation securi... Doug Keen
- Re: [CFCDev] implicit invocation securi... Cameron Childress
- RE: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security c... Brian Kotek
- Re: [CFCDev] implicit invocation security c... Sean Corfield
