|
Ka-ching… usually you see me on that
side of the chat also. Not this time. When you compare Visual Studio with Flex
Builder 2… eh, free distribution in both cases. Hmmm… seems like a
major shift just saying it will be under 1K. They shipped CFReports free with
CF and the report builder is also free. Your talking the old Macromedia…
and certainly not giving Adobe credit here either. Microsoft has a history of failed products…
they leave them behind. Here’s a little marketing class for you. (
DIVERSIFICATION : don’t put all your eggs in one basket… I think Microsoft
has heard of it before.) With those two details in mind… (and look how
many attempts MS has made to best Google in the search engine war!) Bottom line
is if you are right… the future of MS pivots on XAML… it will
either be a success enough to keep them going, growing or gone. I remember
windows 3.x and it’s crash ability… and Windows 95… heh. The
market won’t bear anything less than super stable. It’s a different
arena and they have to play against Flex. I have one word of advice if XAML doesn’t
hold it’s water against Flex. If someone leaves… rather (WHEN) someone
leaves MS for Adobe to join the Flex team… avoid certain execs who hate
google. Heh! I love it! John Farrar P.S. I am a windows user… but the Mac guys
must be loving this thread! From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Hardy hmmm ... am not sure that's a realistic assessment of the situation. Microsoft has invested an enormous amount of time and money on
it's new platform which includes the WPF (Avalon) Framework. This
has to be a success for Microsoft and so a success it will be. Anyone who
doubts this just needs to look at how Microsoft behaved when the xbox was
launched. With Flex 2 on the horizon and Microsofts entry still in Beta I don't
think anyone could say which is technically the strongest. But if MM continues
to charge high prices for software that MS gives away for free then the future
doesn't look too bright The take-over of MM by Adobe is an interesting twist
but Adobe's strength and focus is on the presentation tier. I'm not convinced
that Coldfusion or Flex had a lot to do with Adobes purchase or what will
happen when the inevitable shuffle takes place. Cheers Pete (aka lad4bear) }½Î You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev' as the subject of the email. CFCDev is run by CFCZone (www.cfczone.org) and supported by CFXHosting (www.cfxhosting.com). An archive of the CFCDev list is available at www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] |
- [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Ung, Seng
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Andrew Scott
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Adrocknaphobia
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John Farrar
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Gary Menzel
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John Farrar
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Peter Hardy
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John Farrar
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John C. Bland II
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Roland Collins
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Peter Hardy
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Peter Hardy
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Doug Arthur
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Gary Menzel
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John C. Bland II
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Sean Corfield
- Re: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml Paul Hastings
- RE: [CFCDev] Xaml vs Mxml John Farrar
