On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Richard Smith <rich...@metafoo.co.uk> >> wrote: >> >>> Ping. >>> >> > Sorry about that. > Completely missed this in my email flood. > > This approach looks ok to me, but I wonder if it would be better to get > Apple to fix their iOS C library instead. > Well, it's not broken in the sense that it does what the C standard library is supposed to do. But it's not providing the "C pieces" of a C++ standard library. I don't know what its design goal is here, but with this patch we don't need to care. Duncan offered to file a bug on this, but I don't know if that's happened. Are there other broken C libraries that we are concerned with? > Probably :) I don't know the complete set of C standard library implementations that people use with libc++, but I'd be surprised if Darwin were the only case we need to fix.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits