aaronpuchert marked an inline comment as done. aaronpuchert added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901#1239759, @delesley wrote: > This looks okay to me, but I have not tested it on a large code base to see > if it breaks anything. On our code base (not as large as Google's) there was one true positive and no false positives. At least for templates we should be fine now, since we assume that all type-dependent base classes could have any attribute. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D51901 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
