rjmccall added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D53705#1279068, @svenvh wrote:
> Unlikely, since address spaces are provided in a different way in OpenCL C++ > vs OpenCL C. > > OpenCL C provides qualifiers such as `global` as part of the language. > OpenCL C++ provides template classes such as `cl::global<T>` through a header > file. So OpenCL C code has to be completely rewritten if it needs to be used as part of an OpenCL C++ program? And it doesn't really compose like a type if it's supposed to change how a variable is stored. What a terrible little mess they've made for themselves. I think a better solution might be to hack the parser to recognize cases like this. It's more annoying work, but it'll lead to much better results. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D53705 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
